Quercetin
Evidence Fact Sheet
3,3',4',5,7-Pentahydroxyflavone
Quercetin is a plant flavonol (3,3',4',5,7-pentahydroxyflavone) studied as an antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and mast-cell-stabilizing compound. Human RCTs and meta-analyses show small blood-pressure and CRP reductions at >=500 mg/day, plus honest null findings on lipids and fasting glucose. Standard powder is poorly absorbed.
Also known as: Quercetin · Quercetin dihydrate · Quercetin Phytosome (Quercefit®/Lecigon®) · Isoquercitrin (quercetin-3-O-glucoside)
Overview
Quercetin is a dietary flavonol found in onions, apples, capers and tea, sold as a supplement in standard aglycone powder and enhanced-bioavailability forms (Quercetin Phytosome/Quercefit, enzymatically-modified isoquercitrin). Mechanistic research centers on direct ROS scavenging, NF-kB / NLRP3 inflammasome inhibition, NRF2/Keap1 antioxidant pathway activation, and mast-cell stabilization; it is also a moderate CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein modulator, which underlies its theoretical drug-interaction profile. A typical educational reference dose is 500-1000 mg/day of standard powder taken with a fat-containing meal, but the aglycone powder is poorly absorbed, so trial data from enhanced-bioavailability Phytosome/isoquercitrin forms (which reach substantially higher blood levels) must NOT be back-applied to standard-powder products. Regulatory status: a US FDA GRAS no-questions letter exists (GRN 341, up to 500 mg/serving) and quercetin is a DSHEA dietary-supplement ingredient permitted Structure/Function claims only; EFSA rejected its antioxidant/cardiovascular health claims for insufficient causal evidence, and it is not on the SAMR (China) or ANVISA (Brazil) supplement positive lists. No disease claims are permitted in any market.
Mechanism of Action
Direct ROS/RNS free-radical scavenging (B-ring catechol) · NF-κB / NLRP3 inflammasome pathway inhibition · NRF2 / Keap1 antioxidant pathway activation · Mast-cell stabilization / histamine release modulation · AMPK / SIRT1 activation (mechanism research) · CYP3A4 / P-gp modulation (drug-interaction relevant)
Body systems: Cellular Renewal · Immune System · Cardiovascular · Respiratory & Mucosal Barrier · Mitochondrial & Cellular Energy
Evidence-Based Benefits
Each benefit below is anchored to a specific PubMed-indexed study. Effect sizes, sample sizes, and p-values are reported as published; no values are inferred. Honest negatives and null results are kept alongside the positive findings, and disease-research populations are described as such — Quercetin is not characterized as a treatment for any disease.
Blood Pressure
Meta-analysis supported- −3.04 mmHgsystolic · p=0.028
- −2.63 mmHgdiastolic · p<0.001
- 7 trials / 587pooled patients
In a pooled meta-analysis of 7 RCTs (9 treatment arms, 587 patients), quercetin produced a small but statistically significant reduction in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure. The effect on systolic BP was driven by the higher-dose subgroup: significant only at >=500 mg/day (-4.45 mmHg) and not significant below that dose (-1.59 mmHg, p=0.273), supporting a dose threshold for any BP signal.
Reported effect: Systolic WMD -3.04 mmHg (95% CI -5.75, -0.33, P=0.028); diastolic WMD -2.63 mmHg (95% CI -3.26, -2.01, P<0.001); at >=500 mg/day systolic WMD -4.45 mmHg (P=0.007)
“Systolic BP: WMD: -3.04 mm Hg, 95% CI: -5.75, -0.33, P=0.028 ... Diastolic BP: WMD: -2.63 mm Hg, 95% CI: -3.26, -2.01, P<0.001 ... Subgroup (>=500 mg/day) Systolic BP: WMD: -4.45 mm Hg, 95% CI: -7.70, -1.21, P=0.007 ... Subgroup (<500 mg/day) Systolic BP: WMD: -1.59 mm Hg, 95% CI: -4.44, 1.25, P=0.273”
Source: PMID 27405810 · Serban 2016 · J Am Heart Assoc
Inflammation (CRP)
Meta-analysis supported- −0.33 mg/lCRP · p<0.001
- 7 RCTs10 treatment arms
- −0.34 mg/l>=500 mg/day subgroup
A meta-analysis of 7 RCTs (10 treatment arms) found quercetin significantly lowered circulating C-reactive protein, a systemic inflammation marker. The reduction was most evident in trials using >=500 mg/day and in participants with baseline CRP <3 mg/l, though meta-regression found no significant association between CRP change and either dose or baseline CRP.
Reported effect: Circulating CRP WMD -0.33 mg/l (95% CI -0.50 to -0.15; P<0.001); >=500 mg/day subgroup WMD -0.34 mg/l (95% CI -0.52, -0.16; P<=0.001)
“The meta-analysis of seven RCTs (10 treatment arms) showed a significant reduction of circulating CRP levels (WMD: -0.33 mg/l; 95% CI: -0.50 to -0.15; P<0.001) following quercetin supplementation. ... A significant reducing effect was observed in trials with >=500 mg/day dosage (WMD: -0.34 mg/l; 95% CI: -0.52, -0.16; P<=0.001)”
Source: PMID 28537580 · Mohammadi-Sartang 2017 · Eur J Clin Nutr
Glycemic Control
Null / no benefit Meta-analysis supported- no effect on FPGoverall · null
- −1.08FPG WMD · >=500 mg/d
This is an honest negative: across 9 RCTs (10 effect sizes), quercetin did NOT significantly affect overall fasting plasma glucose, HOMA-IR or HbA1c in metabolic-syndrome populations. Significant improvements appeared only in specific subgroups (>=8 weeks duration or >=500 mg/day for FPG; age <45 or >=500 mg/day for insulin), so the headline finding is no overall glycemic benefit.
Reported effect: Overall: no effect on FPG, HOMA-IR, HbA1c. Subgroups: FPG WMD -1.08 (95% CI -2.08, -0.07) at >=500 mg/day; insulin WMD -1.57 (95% CI -1.98, -1.16) at >=500 mg/day
“quercetin supplementation did not affect fasting plasma glucose (FPG), homeostasis model of assessment-estimated insulin resistance, and hemoglobin A1c levels. ... FPG reduction (quercetin >=500 mg/day): WMD: -1.08; 95% CI [-2.08, -0.07] ... Insulin reduction (quercetin >=500 mg/day): WMD: -1.57; 95% CI [-1.98, -1.16]”
Source: PMID 30848564 · Ostadmohammadi 2019 · Phytother Res
Lipid Profile
Null / no benefit Meta-analysis supported- LDL p=0.23null
- HDL p=0.61null
Another honest negative: a meta-analysis of 5 RCTs (442 participants) found no clinically relevant effect of quercetin on total cholesterol, LDL or HDL. Triglycerides fell significantly only in the high-dose/longer-duration subgroup (>=500 mg/day, >=4 weeks: -24.54 mg/dL), and the authors concluded the evidence does not support a meaningful lipid-lowering effect apart from triglycerides at higher doses.
Reported effect: TC WMD +3.13 mg/dL (95% CI -0.01 to 6.27, p=0.05); LDL +1.43 mg/dL (p=0.23); HDL +0.26 mg/dL (p=0.61); TG -9.42 mg/dL (p=0.32); TG at >=500 mg/day -24.54 mg/dL (p<0.00001)
“Available evidence from RCTs does not suggest any clinically relevant effect of quercetin supplementation on plasma lipids, apart from a significant reduction of triglycerides at doses above 50 mg/day. ... LDL-C: WMD 1.43 mg/dL, 95% CI -0.92 to 3.78, p=0.23 ... HDL-C: WMD 0.26 mg/dL, 95% CI -0.74 to 1.25, p=0.61”
Source: PMID 25897620 · Sahebkar 2017 · Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr
Vascular Senescence / Aging Biology
RCT supported- 4% vs 18%post-op AF · quercetin vs placebo
In a randomized double-blind trial of 97 coronary-artery-bypass patients (500 mg twice daily peri-operatively), quercetin reversed overexpressed senescence and inflammaging pathways in male vascular cells and improved endothelium-dependent relaxation in men, with significantly lower post-operative atrial fibrillation (4% vs 18%). Notably, the effect was sex-specific: in female cells quercetin had minimal endothelial benefit and a pro-inflammatory effect, an important honest caveat against generalizing the benefit.
Reported effect: Post-operative atrial fibrillation 4% (quercetin) vs 18% (placebo); endothelial relaxation improved in men but not women; senescence/inflammaging pathways reversed in male but not female vascular cells
“Post-operative atrial fibrillation incidence was significantly lower with quercetin, representing 4% of the patients compared to 18% in the placebo group. ... Endothelial acetylcholine-induced relaxation improved significantly with quercetin ... with effects in men but not in women. ... In female cells, quercetin had minimal endothelial benefit and increased inflammaging in fibroblasts.”
Source: PMID 40375481 · Mury 2025 · Aging Cell
Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver (NAFLD)
RCT supported- 11.5%→9.6%liver fat · p=0.013
In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial (36 completers, 500 mg/day for 12 weeks), quercetin moderately reduced intrahepatic lipid content from 11.5% to 9.6% versus placebo, with a small body-weight reduction and no change in other secondary outcomes or liver enzymes. The hepatic-fat reduction was about twice as large in women as in men.
Reported effect: Intrahepatic lipid 11.5%+/-6.4% to 9.6%+/-5.8% with quercetin vs placebo (P=0.013, adjusted P=0.028); body weight -1.5+/-2.6 kg (P<0.05)
“quercetin intervention moderately decreased the intrahepatic lipid contents from 11.5% +/- 6.4% to 9.6% +/- 5.8%, compared with the placebo intervention ... P = 0.013, adjusted P = 0.028 ... Body weight and body mass index were mildly reduced by 1.5 +/- 2.6 kg and 0.5 +/- 0.9 kg/m2 after the quercetin intervention (P < 0.05)”
Source: PMID 39032786 · Li 2024 · Am J Clin Nutr
Allergy / Histamine Response
RCT supportedIn a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind parallel study (66 subjects, 200 mg quercetin phytosome for 4 weeks), allergic symptom scores (eye itching, sneezing, nasal discharge, sleep disorder) and quality-of-life measures were reported as significantly improved versus placebo. The abstract describes direction only and reports no p-values or effect-size numbers, so the magnitude is not extractable; note this used an enhanced-bioavailability phytosome form, not standard powder.
Effect size: this study reports the direction of the finding but does not state a specific numeric effect size, so none is given here rather than estimated.
“several scores of JRQLQ, including allergic symptoms, such as eye itching, sneezing, nasal discharge, and sleep disorder, were significantly improved in the quercetin-containing supplement group compared with the placebo group.”
Source: PMID 35776034 · Yamada 2022 · Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci
Upper-Respiratory Illness in Athletes
RCT supported- 1/20 vs 9/20URTI · p=0.004
In 40 trained male cyclists given 1000 mg/day, quercetin significantly reduced upper-respiratory-tract infection incidence in the 2 weeks after intensive exercise (1/20 vs 9/20). The honest mechanistic caveat: it did NOT change natural-killer-cell activity, lymphocyte proliferation, neutrophil oxidative burst or salivary IgA, so the clinical benefit occurred without measurable immune-marker shifts.
Reported effect: URTI incidence 1/20 (quercetin) vs 9/20 (placebo), Kaplan-Meier statistic=8.31, P=0.004; no significant change in NKCA, PHA-LP, POBA, or sIgA
“URTI incidence during the 2-wk postexercise period differed significantly between groups (quercetin=1/20 vs placebo=9/20, Kaplan-Meier analysis statistic=8.31, P=0.004). ... Pre- to postexercise changes in NKCA, PHA-LP, POBA, and sIgA did not differ significantly between quercetin and placebo groups.”
Source: PMID 17805089 · Nieman 2007 · Med Sci Sports Exerc
COVID-19 (Acute Infection)
Meta-analysis supported- OR 0.25hospitalisation · 95% CI 0.10–0.62
- OR 0.31ICU · 95% CI 0.10–0.99
A meta-analysis of 6 RCTs found quercetin (often as phytosome) was associated with reduced odds of hospitalization and ICU admission in COVID-19 patients, but did NOT reduce all-cause mortality or the rate of non-recovery. The authors stress that large-scale RCTs are still needed, so this is a preliminary, mixed signal rather than established benefit.
Reported effect: ICU admission OR=0.31 (95% CI 0.10-0.99); hospitalisation OR=0.25 (95% CI 0.10-0.62); no reduction in all-cause mortality or rate of no recovery
“decreased the risk of intensive care unit admission (OR = 0.31; 95% CI 0.10-0.99) ... decreased ... the incidence of hospitalisation (OR = 0.25; 95% CI 0.10-0.62) ... did not decrease the risk of all-cause mortality and the rate of no recovery”
Source: PMID 36779438 · Cheema 2023 · Rev Med Virol
Uric Acid (Pre-Hyperuricaemia)
RCT supported- −26.5 µmol/luric acid · p=0.008
In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial of 22 healthy pre-hyperuricaemic males (500 mg/day for 4 weeks), quercetin significantly lowered plasma uric acid by 26.5 micromol/l. The reduction occurred without changing fasting glucose, urinary uric acid excretion or blood pressure, suggesting a specific effect on circulating urate.
Reported effect: Plasma uric acid lowered by -26.5 micromol/l (95% CI -7.6, -45.5; P=0.008); no effect on fasting glucose, urinary uric acid excretion or blood pressure
“plasma uric acid concentrations were significantly lowered by -26.5 micromol/l (95% CI, -7.6, -45.5; P=0.008) ... without affecting fasting glucose, urinary excretion of uric acid or blood pressure”
Source: PMID 26785820 · Shi 2016 · Br J Nutr
Dosage (research context · not a recommendation)
500–1000 mg/day standard powder with a fat-containing meal (educational reference); allergy/cardiovascular RCTs frequently use Quercetin Phytosome (Quercefit®) 200–500 mg/day — bioavailability of standard aglycone powder is <1%, so Phytosome/isoquercitrin (~5–20× Cmax) trial data must NOT be back-applied to standard-powder products. Long-term use ≥1500 mg/day lacks adequate human data.
Regulatory Status · 4 Markets
- US · FDA
- DSHEA dietary supplement ingredient — FDA GRAS Notice GRN 341 (Quercegen Pharma; quercetin up to 500 mg/serving) received an FDA no-questions letter in 2010; Quercefit® has an independent safety dossier · Structure/Function Claims only (FDA disclaimer required) · NOT 'FDA approved' · no disease claims (cancer / allergic rhinitis / asthma / hypertension / COVID-19 all prohibited)
- EU · EFSA
- Food supplement ingredient · EFSA NDA Panel REJECTED quercetin health claims (antioxidant / DNA-protection / cardiovascular) under Reg 1924/2006 Art.13.1 (2009-2011, insufficient causal evidence) · no authorized Art.13.1/14 health claim · ≤500 mg/day tolerability assessed (EFSA 2011) · may be sold without efficacy labelling
- CN · China
- Purified quercetin not on SAMR health-food raw-material catalogue; quercetin-bearing plant extracts (onion, ginkgo) usable in health food; cross-border e-commerce sole compliant C-end channel.
- BR · ANVISA
- Purified quercetin NOT listed in IN 28/2018 dietary-supplement positive list · possible fitoterápico route requires separate registration · no disease-risk-reduction claim
Safety
50+ human RCTs report no serious adverse events; mild GI upset / headache <5%. Moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor + P-gp inhibitor — theoretical interaction risk with cyclosporine, tacrolimus, statins, DOAC anticoagulants, digoxin (consult a healthcare provider). High-dose long-term use may suppress thyroid peroxidase (animal mechanistic data) — caution in hypothyroid/Hashimoto individuals. Insufficient data in pregnancy/lactation — not recommended. Standard-powder vs Phytosome/isoquercitrin bioavailability data must not be cross-extrapolated.
Related
Goals: inflammation-relief · heart-health
Lifestyles: senior-60-plus
References
PubMed-indexed citations anchoring the benefit findings above. Effect sizes are reported as published.
- PMID 27405810 · Serban 2016 · J Am Heart Assoc — Blood Pressure
- PMID 28537580 · Mohammadi-Sartang 2017 · Eur J Clin Nutr — Inflammation (CRP)
- PMID 30848564 · Ostadmohammadi 2019 · Phytother Res — Glycemic Control
- PMID 25897620 · Sahebkar 2017 · Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr — Lipid Profile
- PMID 40375481 · Mury 2025 · Aging Cell — Vascular Senescence / Aging Biology
- PMID 39032786 · Li 2024 · Am J Clin Nutr — Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver (NAFLD)
- PMID 35776034 · Yamada 2022 · Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci — Allergy / Histamine Response
- PMID 17805089 · Nieman 2007 · Med Sci Sports Exerc — Upper-Respiratory Illness in Athletes
- PMID 36779438 · Cheema 2023 · Rev Med Virol — COVID-19 (Acute Infection)
- PMID 26785820 · Shi 2016 · Br J Nutr — Uric Acid (Pre-Hyperuricaemia)
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What are quercetin's well-known honest negatives?
Two stand out. First, a meta-analysis of 9 RCTs found quercetin did not significantly change overall fasting glucose, HOMA-IR or HbA1c (benefit appeared only in narrow subgroups). Second, a meta-analysis of 5 RCTs found no clinically relevant effect on total cholesterol, LDL or HDL, with only triglycerides falling at higher doses. In athletes, quercetin reduced post-exercise illness but produced no measurable change in immune markers, and a 2025 surgical trial found its vascular benefit occurred in men but not women.
2. How much quercetin is typically used, and does the form matter?
A common educational reference is 500-1000 mg/day of standard powder taken with a fat-containing meal, but absorption is the key issue: standard quercetin aglycone powder is poorly absorbed. Enhanced forms such as Quercetin Phytosome (Quercefit) and enzymatically-modified isoquercitrin reach substantially higher peak blood levels, and several positive allergy and cardiovascular trials used those forms. Trial results from phytosome/isoquercitrin products should not be assumed to apply to ordinary powder.
3. Is quercetin safe, and does it interact with medications?
Across numerous human RCTs no serious adverse events were reported, with mild GI upset or headache in a small minority of participants. The main caution is drug interactions: quercetin is a moderate CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein inhibitor, so it carries a theoretical interaction risk with drugs like cyclosporine, tacrolimus, statins, certain anticoagulants and digoxin. High-dose long-term use has animal-level signals on thyroid peroxidase, and it is not recommended in pregnancy or lactation due to insufficient data. Consult a healthcare provider if you take prescription medication.
4. Is quercetin approved by regulators to treat allergies, blood pressure or COVID-19?
No. In the US it is a DSHEA dietary-supplement ingredient with a GRAS no-questions letter (up to 500 mg/serving) and is limited to Structure/Function claims with the FDA disclaimer; it is not 'FDA approved' and disease claims are prohibited. EFSA rejected quercetin's antioxidant and cardiovascular health claims for insufficient causal evidence, and it is not on China's SAMR or Brazil's ANVISA supplement positive lists. The COVID-19 data (reduced hospitalization/ICU odds but no mortality benefit in a 6-RCT meta-analysis) is preliminary and not a basis for any treatment claim.
5. Does the blood-pressure and CRP benefit depend on dose?
The evidence points that way. In the blood-pressure meta-analysis the significant systolic reduction was confined to the >=500 mg/day subgroup (-4.45 mmHg, p=0.007) and was non-significant below 500 mg/day (-1.59 mmHg, p=0.273). Similarly, the CRP meta-analysis found its clearest reduction in trials using >=500 mg/day. This dose threshold, combined with the very low bioavailability of standard powder, is one reason effects are modest and form-dependent.
Last evidence review: 2026-06-13